Articles
Discipline de pharmacologie,
Faculté de chirurgie dentaire,
Université René-Descartes Paris-V, Montrouge, France
Since the discovery of acetyl salicylic acid by Hoffmann in 1899, it has long been suspected that another way of research was about to be opened up, from which innovative pharmacological treatments would be developed. Initially, these would certainly be laborious but, over the last decades, extremely fruitful. These innovations allow us to understand not only the technology of the development of biologically active molecules, their sensitivity and enzymology, but...
Until recently, the use of drugs in the treatment of inflammatory periodontal disorders brought to mind an exclusively pharmacological, mostly interventional, approach by means of derivatives of arachidonic acid.
Data that have been acquired on the physiopathological mechanisms of the inflammatory response have demonstrated a triad of players : the cells, the enzymes and the mediators of inflammation. As a result, we now have a more rational and innovative pharmacological approach : the use of liposomal clodronate directed to a cellular target such as the macrophage ; the use of a specific enzyme inhibitor to block target enzymes such as cyclo-oxygenase type 2 ; targeting a mediator of inflammation such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) by using such inhibitors as type 4 phophodiesterase or anti-TNF- α monoclonal antibodies.
As a consequence, one can suggest treating periodontal inflammation by these various approaches after preliminary clinical pharmacological evaluation has assessed their indications for use.
Since the discovery of acetyl salicylic acid by Hoffmann in 1899, it has long been suspected that another way of research was about to be opened up, from which innovative pharmacological treatments would be developed. Initially, these would certainly be laborious but, over the last decades, extremely fruitful. These innovations allow us to understand not only the technology of the development of biologically active molecules, their sensitivity and enzymology, but equally or general knowledge and understanding. A basically clinical concept, the tetrad of Celsus, has been replaced with a cellular and molecular concept, a triad of components involved in inflammation : cells, enzymes and mediators. Guided rationally by the soundness of this concept, pharmacological modulators of cell function, enzymes and inflammatory mediators are being developed. By way of example, one can cite the direct inhibitors of the formation of lipid mediators such as those derived from arachidonic acid, prostaglandins, and leucotrienes, which are obtained by blocking the key enzymes, cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase respectively. Similarly, one can mention the indirect inhibition of the formation of peptide mediators, in particular certain cytokines (TNF-α) by pharmacological modulators such as type 4 phosphodiesterase by directing this enzyme to the inflammatory cells that produce these cytokines.
In the area of periodontal diseases, when surgery is almost unavoidable, one is led to suggest a non-surgical alternative, developing from a pharmacological approach to the disease. However, even if the pathology is due to a an imbalance between the host an infectious agent, the most promising way forward seems to be towards pharmacological control of the host response, that is to say, towards pharmacological control of the inflammatory components of the pathology. Beside the established strategies of using steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, there are now innovative approaches that have already been used in the pharmacological control of inflammation but their relevance to periodontal diseases remains to be evaluated.
The majority of these products have not been used recently for therapeutic purposes but they continue to be of pharmacological interest for research or clinical use into inflammation. In effect, this is to provide information on the mechanisms of pharmacological activity at a molecular level. This allows us to consider these products not only as real analytical tools in pharmacological research but equally as methods of treatment, the value of which has to be assessed at a clinical level. In order to illustrate this proposition, we will take two types of product, one still at an experimental stage (liposomal clodronate) and the other (colchicine) which is already in use.
Clodronate (international nomenclature), otherwise known as dichloromethylene biphosphonate (chemical name) is an organo-phosphate of the biphosphonate family. It has a strong affinity not only for hydroxyapatite but equally for numerous divalent cations (calcium, magnesium, etc.) (Fonong et al., 1983). It has cytotoxic activity not only against procaryotes such as the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum (Pelorgeas et al., 1992) but also against some eucaryototic cells, such as osteoclasts, and therefore leads to inhibition of bone resorption (Flanagan and Chambers, 1989). Intravenous injection of clodronate encapsulated in liposomes (liposomal clodronate) into experimental animals causes a reduction of splenic macrophages and of the Küppfer cells of the liver (van Rooijen and van Nieuwmegen, 1984). These results demonstrate that in animal experiments, a reduction in macrophages can take place, using liposomes containing clodronate (van Rooijen and Sanders, 1994).
This essentially experimental pharmacological approach, using this form of clodronate, is of relevance to the role of the macrophage in the recruitment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. This inflammatory response is brought about by the formation and secretion of chemotactic factors by macrophages such as chemokines (IL-8, GRO/MGSA, CINC, MIP-2, etc.) (Miller and Krangel, 1992), platelet activating factor (PAF) (quoted by Braquet et al., 1987) and leucotriene B4 (Walsh et al., 1981). The clinical application of this pharmacological approach is limited by the means of administration of liposomal clodronate in relationship to the location of the macrophages to be depleted.
This product is currently used in the treatment and prevention of acute attacks of gout. In this inflammatory disease, there is an accumulation of microcrystals of sodium urate (gout) or of calcium pyrophosphate (pseudo-gout) in joints (Spilberg et al., 1980) which induces the chemotaxis, adhesion and phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear neutrophils. This alkaloid extract of the seeds and bulbs of colchicum, Colchicum autumnale (autumn crocus or meadow saffron) of the Liliaceous family, has a cytotoxic action directed mainly against the locomotor system of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. In effect, colchicine is a poison that acts on the microtubular cytoskeleton. These microtubules consist of a polymerised protein, the tubulin. Colchicine is able to attach or form complexes that attach to these 100 kDa molecules at the site of elongation of these microtubules, inhibiting their growth by polymerisation (Detrich et al., 1981 and 1982).
It is well known that neutrophils have a part to play in tissue destruction (Weiss, 1989). A pharmacological involvement on these polymorphonuclear cells involved in the inflammatory reaction is a more innovative anti-inflammatory approach (though still old !). Steroidal or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SAIDs or NSAIDs) may be used. Unlike SAIDs and NSAIDs, colchicine does not have an analgesic effect. However, since tubulin is also found in smooth and striated muscle cells and in sperm cells, the non-specificity of the intracellular target limits the therapeutic margin of safety of colchicine. The side effects of its use that have been described - digestive problems, myopathy, oligo- or aspermia - illustrate this.
Amongst the enzymatic activity generally recognized as being implicated in the inflammatory response, one cannot fail to recall the cells that lead to the formation of derivatives of arachidonic acid and, more especially, the prostaglandins and thromboxane derived from prostaglandin H2 synthetase, otherwise known as cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Furthermore, other enzymatic activities are also present and their modulation by drugs can lead to a reduction in inflammatory cell response and of the biosynthesis of certain mediators of inflammation. In addition, we will present novel inhibitors of type 2 cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2), metalloprotease inhibitors as well as inhibitors of type 4 phosphodiesterase.
We owe the identification of COX-2 to Needleman's group. They detected a protein different from cyclo-oxygenase (COX) until then known to be derived from human monocytes that had been stimulated by IL-1 (Fu et al., 1990). Subsequent research into its molecular biology, with the aim of identifying the genes responsible for its induction during the immediate or early inflammatory stimulus, isolated a gene very homologous to that for COX that had already been identified. It was therefore recognized that there were 2 isoforms of COX, one later to be called COX-1 and the other, induced by various pro-inflammatory agents such as LPS, MDP, activated zymosan, IL-1, TNF-α, called COX-2.
Research into the inhibitors of COX-2 have revealed that its main role (Hawkley, 1999) is to control the inflammatory response, not only in terms of its efficacy and specificity but equally in terms of tolerance. Aspirin as well as all the NSAIDs block COX-2 but they also block COX-1 and it is the effect on the latter which very likely causes the numerous undesirable side effects, especially the digestive problems that have bee described in connection with these drugs. Actually, several inhibitors of COX-2 have ben identified and put onto the market in France. They have a preferential specificity in the case of meloxicam (Mobic®) and selective in the case of rofecoxib (Vioxx®). A study of the data sheets indicates that the digestive side effects have been overcome but the other side effects remain.
The role of matrix metalloprotease (MMP) in the inflammatory process has been demonstrated by the action of proteases in the breakdown of the extracellular components of the matrix (Birkedal-Hansen, 1993) and by their capacity to activate pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α (Gearing et al., 1994).
Developments in the area of MMP inhibitors (MMPIs) are attributed to Golub and 1984). They have provided evidence for the inhibitory activity of tetracyclines on MMPIs, especially the collagenases MMP-8 and MMP-13 and the gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9. Subsequent decisive work to develop chemically modified tetracyclines (CMTs) has met with success. These compounds, which lack antibacterial activity but which otherwise retain improved MMPI activity (Golub et al., 1987), have enabled pharmacological control of those biological processes that are dependent on MMPs. Because CMT-3 has also been shown to have a major effect on the division and invasiveness of tumour cells as well as on their potential for metastatic spread in vivo, they are currently under evaluation in oncology (Seftor et al., 1998). Doxycycline, in non-antimicrobial doses, has been developed by the company CollaGex Pharmaceutical, Inc. under the name Periostat®. In October 1998 it received an AMM from the FDA as an indication of its value as an adjuvant in the treatment of periodontal disease.
Another promising way in connection with pharmacological inhibitors of MMPs seems to be with derivatives of hydroxamic acid. In particular, the compound FN-439, a tetrapeptide derived from hydroxamic acid, a selective inhibitor of MMPs (p-NH2-Bz-Gly-Pro-D-Ala-NHOH, Fuji Chemical Industry) has shown an ability to interfere with the recruitment of neutrophils stimulated by LTB4 (Oda et al., 1995).
This innovative approach is founded on the capacity of type 4 phosphodiesterase (PDE4) inhibitors to increase the concentration of intracellular cAMP. Type 4 phosphodiesterases are implicated in the cleavage of cAMP to 5'-AMP. Their inhibition allows the phosphorylation cascade to be activated via protein kinases A, thus contributing to the abolition of many of the functions of inflammatory and immunologically active cells (Teixeira et al., 1997).
Admittedly, the evaluation of PDE4 inhibitors has focused on allergic reactions having a strong inflammatory component, such as asthma, but the experimental results are very encouraging for septic shock induced by LPS, ischaemia and reperfusion situations and rheumatoid arthritis (Teixeira et al., 1997). This opens up a large number of applications for drug therapy in the treatment of human disease. However, the factor limiting clinical trials on PDE4 inhibitors is their potential for inducing undesirable side effects, especially nausea and vomiting.
The development of new drugs relating to the area of peptidic mediators of inflammation, notably pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8 is dependent on progress made in our understanding of the mechanisms of action of various types of drugs that are already known to be appropriate for the treatment of inflammation :
- DPE4 inhibitors. These compounds inhibit the release of certain cytokines (TNF-α and IL-8) (Teixeira et al., 1997);
- the glucocorticoids especially dexamethasone. These products are capable of interfering with the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Satoh et al., 1991) ;
- anti-cytokine antibodies. These experimental products enable characterisation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines implicated in the inflammatory reaction.
One may be surprised by a paucity of pharmacological discoveries, but the domain of pharmacological innovation encompasses both the discovery of new compounds and new indications for the use of existing compounds. Nevertheless, our perception of a strategy for the use of anti-inflammatory agents in the periodontal area is not restricted to pharmacological considerations or by their means of administration, oral or parenteral. The local or topical administration, particularly intrasulcular, thanks to irrigation systems or slow release devices, must not be neglected. However, in order to guarantee the best treatment for the patient, the efficacy and safety of these products must, especially, be taken into consideration.
Rubor, dolor, tumor, calor, to which Galien added a fifth criterion, loss of function of the inflamed tissue.
Demande de tirés à part
Charles-Daniel ARRETO, Discipline de pharmacologie, Faculté de Chirurgie dentaire, Université René-Descartes Paris-V, 1, rue Maurice-Arnoux, 92120 MONTROUGE - FRANCE.